Amendment – Supreme Court split decision review

As John Roberts, Chief Judge just opined in his decent, the vote of 5 judges can currently overrule established law, and the will of 100’s of million citizens of the United States. To prevent a narrow decision of the Supreme Court of the United States from overturning established law, and the will of “We the People” let our constitution be amended as follows:

We the people expect that the application of law and the Constitution shall be clear, therefore to protect ourselves for decisions of the Courts that do not receive 2/3 of the votes of the Justices, resolve:

All decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, or any Federal Court proposing nationwide application, for which the Supreme Court of the United States does not take up review, having failed to gain 2/3 of the votes of the Judges, shall be suspended and await immediate review by the US Senate.

The US Senate representing the interest of the Citizens and the States shall make the review of these decisions the first matter of business on the next day the Senate is in session following the decision. Without debate, the Senate shall take a roll call vote to either affirm the decision, or suspend the decision for further review by the Court. No decision of the Court with less than 2/3 of the votes of the Judges shall have any nationwide effect without the consent of a majority of the Senators voting to affirm the decision of the small majority of Judges.

Enactment Notes: After enactment, this measure shall immediately be in effect for all future decisions. The United States Senate may hold votes to affirm all small majority decisions made on or after July 1, 2015.

 

 

State succession round two

Will these Supreme Court decisions lead to States voting to succeed to reclaim their States rights?

Will border issues drive Southern States to leave the US and stand on their own?

It would be odd if Abe held the union together, and Barack helped tear it apart.

dishonest Barack vs. honest Abe

If this quote of Obama is accurate honest Abe would cringe.

“It would simply be an acknowledgment that the cause for which they fought, the cause of slavery was wrong.”

“It would be one step in an honest accounting of American history.”

Honest Abe made it clear in his inaugural address it was not a struggle over slavery

Lincoln knew the fight was about taxes not slavery.

Abe made it about slavery to gain continued support from the Northern taxpayers who were tired of killing southerners over their complaints about taxes and tariff  designed to enrich the North that were hurting the South.

.

Climate Change complete – SCOTUS overturns democracy

Those who believe as I do that “Acts of God” still properly define extreme weather events, are concerned that the Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) has put the finishing touches on climate change.

We no longer live in a climate of democracy.  We now live under the dictates of whatever 5 lawyers agree to declare; citizens, States, and Congress be damned.

The United States of SCOTUS does not allow the citizens to decide democratically what freedoms the majority of citizens in each State, choose to surrender to the State, to gain increased security and freedom.

5/9th of SCOTUS make it clear they know better than Congress, or the States, or the citizens thereof.

5/9th of SCOTUS says abiding by democratically chosen laws, that are not to their liking, even if they are to the liking of the majority as expressed in democratic ballot voting, or the free religious beliefs of many within those majorities, may not stand. 5 votes of SCOTUS is all it takes to create new law, not subject to veto, or legislative adjustments, or true Constitutional review.   4 votes in SCOTUS write clear warnings of the lack of Constitutional basis for the acts of the 5, that will impact 100’s of Millions to their dislike.

5/9th of SCOTUS will not wait, but will find a way to trump the will of men, and even the will of God if needed.

5/9 of SCOTUS will challenge God to prove the Words in sacred texts are in fact promises of blessing or divine curses.

If Acts of God increase, score one for God, and against SCOTUS: not developing nations, or fossil fuels.

SCOTUS may not have completed the climate change, they may have more that 5 of them are willing to do to take away our ability to democratically choose what freedoms we will surrender to preserve, protect, defend and secure our remaining Freedoms, and increase our security.

Society ruled not by public votes, or the votes of our representatives, but by 5/9th of SCOTUS will never be secure.  They have granted a new freedom to some, but have raped the freedoms and security of many who now will be drawn into court to defend the conflict of religious freedom, and this new SCOTUS freedom, and may well suffer the impact of SCOTUS driven climate change.

Truth or exaggerated hyperbole?

I guess I should not plan to ever be elected, as I prefer Truth instead of over-the-top exaggerated hyperbole.

The Supreme Court issues a ruling this week, and when reading the reaction of the progressives you would think they approved ending all birth control, and allowing employers to prohibit employees from using their paycheck to buy things their employer does not buy for them.

WOW    that is so far off the mark it makes me embarrassed that their intellectual honesty is so low, that those who want to get elected, will say whatever will help them raise money to buy elections.

MOST of what I own, I used my paycheck to buy.

I am sure that is true for ALL of us, unless we are slaves.

VERY FEW of us have our off work activity limited by our employers.  Some entertainers do have performance contracts that include off field limitations, but most of us are not under performance contracts.

We all use our paychecks to buy things that our employer does not buy for us.  That is part of why we work.

We want the freedom, and means, to buy the things we want to buy.  The fact that my employer does not want to buy something for me, does not mean I can’t buy it myself.

The world did not end, the Supreme Court did not outlaw spending your money, it only agreed that a closely held family employer, who has strong moral beliefs, can not be force to buy something that is 100% against those beliefs. They offer birth control coverage that takes effect before the egg is fertilized, just not those methods that stop fertilized eggs from becoming babies that take their first breath.

The progressives, (and extremists on the Right for that matter), should get an intellectual honesty pills, and take them daily.

 

Thanks for supporting democracy within the Democratic Party

Once again Barbara is on her way to reelection.

To the 4,600+ who voted with me to have choice in the Democratic party, and at least two candidates, I thank you for your support.

 

Unless some other Democrat steps up in two years to fulfill the role of choice provider, I will be back to serve you again.

 

Your support to offset my cost is appreciated. Support gifts of no more than $100 may be sent to:

Justin Jelincic for Congress     PO Box 971   San Leandro   CA  94577

 

Humbly,

JJ

 

 

 

Vote on Tuesday June 3, 2014

Please vote for me in the primary on Tuesday.

Your Vote could be the ONE that leads to a Democrat vs Democrat general election.

Barbara will finish first on Tuesday.  If I come in second there will be a Democrat vs Democrat general election.

If not Barbara will be reelected as this district will only elect a Democrat.

I ask for your support and vote.

Thank you for considering me and helping create choice and citizen democracy.

 

Keeping the government out of Religious activities

It seems to me that many of the progressives speak out of both sides of their mouth.

With one side they say there needs to be a strong, clear line of separation of Church and State,  but then they champion the government taking on Religious activity, and weakening the houses of worship in the process.

Perhaps their motives are pure, and reflect their view that the Religions in America are failing in their obligations to show charity, but their actions undermine the very institutions that should be providing charity.

When Pastors, Bishops, Rabbis, or other religious leaders ask their flock to get aid from the government, instead of , or in addition to, the religious family, something is wrong.   Wrong with religion, and wrong with government.

The government plays a valid role in creating insurance pools to share risk, but not in offering charity.  Call the subsidies what you will, but if they are handouts of cash, to, or on behalf of, individuals or companies, based on need, and not insurance contract, it is charity.   Payments in excess of the contract obligations, are charity.

FDR provided employment opportunities in the WPA and other programs to give dignity and pay for work, not handouts of charity.  Today the progressives give charity, not dignity, and they borrow from the grandchildren to give that charity.

I for one think that families and the houses of worship are better suited to give intelligent, and appropriate charity.

Government programs should offer compensation for work, or payouts that are supported by insurance purchases.  The government should not steal the dignity of the citizens by telling them they can’t survive without government handouts.

In the extreme, when the government becomes a charity institution,  it has established itself as a religion. When the Federal government establishes itself as a religion, it violates the first amendment prohibition.

Free citizens should be told to put their faith in God,  family, or humanity, but not in the government.

Freedom to Serve

From my morning devotional reading.   

For you have been called to live in freedom, my brothers and sisters. But don’t use your freedom to satisfy your sinful nature. Instead, use your freedom to serve one another in love. –Galatians 5:13, NLT

 This is a principle that, when applied, makes for a better society.   We can choose to make everything self-centered, or we can choose to make everything others centered.   One satisfies the sinful nature and delights the flesh, the other satisfies the soul and delights the heart.

I choose to serve others.

 

 

I offer to serve … again

The candidate list for the June primary in CA is now complete.   As no other Democrat choose to place their name on the ballot, I again have offered to serve. 

An elected Democrat who lives in the district, and wants to serve in the House, choose to apply for the CA 11th Congressional seat being vacated by George Miller, to play by the party rules.   This is why we do not have choice.  To run opposite an incumbent, when the Central Committee does not ask you to, is to “end your political career” 

Look for  Tony Daysog   DEMOCRATIC   who lives in Alameda and will be on the ballot as    Alameda City Councilmember  but not here in the 13th District.

Here in the 13th you have the Central Committee choosing Barbara Lee for you, or you could make your own choice, and choose me.

Also running is: Peace and Freedom Party member Lawrence N. Allen  and Republican Party member Dakin Sundeen.

You have a choice.  The choice is yours.    It’s your vote.   

This district will elect a Democrat.  It is a “Safe” seat for the Party.

If enough people vote for me in June, and I am the 2nd choice, you will have a choice in November, otherwise the race will effectively be over in June, and the Central Committee’s choice will return to D.C.